Rant
Sorry ha, but it kills me when "financial advisors" advise their single, no dependents, low earning clients to "invest" in a VUL product. If these so-called financial advisors were really looking out for the welfare of their clients, then they would not push a VUL product and would instead recommend term insurance, if indeed the client needed life insurance in the first place.
If a person just wants to invest, has no dependents and has no estate to protect (bata pa nga eh, malamang walang pera yan), what's the point of buying life insurance? And VUL to boot pa, which has historically been outperformed by other investment vehicles.
Wala lang, it really irritates me when I hear "financial advisors" touting the advantage of VUL products to someone with next to zero knowledge about investments, clearly taking advantage of that person's naivete.
That's why knowledge is key and I doubt I'll ever have a future selling life insurance.
Here's what Suze has to say about that:
Here's what Suze has to say about that:
Comments
Before they get soemthing from a so-called financial advisor, asked him/her or research what are they getting in return.
So I ended up cutting off the loses and reinvesting the money left in mutual funds instead, where I made so much more money.
That's why I have trust issues with financial institutions who call their sales people financial advisers. In the end, their interest is in selling their own financial products versus actually taking care of their client's financial health.
So yeah, best be on guard because no one can protect your interests more than you.
But for what it's worth, it's part of the learning process. So now I know better and for me that makes it all worth it.
Post a Comment