Growing up, I used to hear anecdotes about my Lola, a public school teacher, giving my Lolo, a public prosecutor, a monthly allowance to spend on his tabako and haircut, while the rest of his salary went to her. She micromanaged their family's budget to the peso, which is why all five of their daughters were able to finish college, with the two youngest daughters even going on to become doctors. My mother mused that she used to resent my Lola for her tightfisted ways, but as she grew older, she realized that if my Lola had not done what she did or if she had left the management of household finances to my Lolo, then they would have been mired in debt and would have had trouble finishing school.
In my own family, my mother outearned my father until I was in law school, and this was mostly because she went into semi-retirement from her medical practice.
Suffice to say that having a financially dominant female figure has always been the norm in my life and I didn't think it odd that the mother provided the monetary support and/or handled the family's finances. I only began to realize that this was an "aberration" when my schoolbooks talked about daddies going off to work while mommies stayed home and kept house.